作者：安顺卓成 来源：原创 发布日期：08-26
A | New Delhi, Oct 20 (UNI) Supreme Court declined to lift the ban on firecrackers and refused to hear the petition filed by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader, Manoj Tiwari challenging the blanket ban on firecrackers in Delhi, after noting that let people breathe clean air and spend your money on sweets instead.
"Let the people breathe clean air, and spend your money on sweets instead," the Supreme Court's bench, headed by Justice M R Shah said, in his order and refused to lift the ban on firecrackers.
Lawyer Shashank Shekhar Jha, advocate appearing for Tiwari, had pleaded to the Supreme Court for lifting ban on firecrackers. He urged the Top that the Delhi government's order on blanket ban on firecrackers is a complete violation. So thereby this Court should pass appropriate order and direction in lifting the ban on firecrackers.
Jha also submitted to the Apex Court that this court had earlier allowed crackers without Barium Salt and green crackers. So this time also, this court should allow sort of similar directions and orders.
Jha also submitted to the Apex Court that the pollution is rising due to Parali (stubble burning) burning and other factors, but Justice Shah refused to hear it on urgent basis and said the Court would hear the petition later.
The BJP leader, Tiwari, had moved the Supreme Court challenging the blanket van order of the Delhi Government on firecrackers in Delhi. But after keeping in view the fact that the pollution level is not in levels, so declined to lift the ban on firecrackers.
Tiwari sought directions to the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government to issue fresh guidelines with regard to sale, purchase and bursting of permissible firecrackers during the upcoming festive season.
The BJP MP also sought directions to all States not to take any coercive action like lodging FIR against common people found selling or using permissible firecrackers.
"In the name of Right to life, freedom of religion cannot be taken away and that a balance has to be struck like that has been done through the decision of this Court dated October 29, 2021," submitted the plea filed through advocate Ashwani Kumar Dubey and Shashank Shekhar Jha.
In 2021, the Supreme Court had clarified there is no blanket ban on use of firecrackers and only those fireworks which contain barium salts are prohibited.
The Top Court had banned the usage of firecrackers which are found to be injurious to health while making it clear that there was no blanket ban on crackers and that people can include permissible firecrackers to celebrate their festival, the plea said.
The AAP government in Delhi on September 7 put a blanket ban on firecrackers with immediate effect in the capital till January 1, 2023.
UNI BAV SY GNK。 据湖南湘潭警方4月20日凌晨通报，2024年4月12日15时41分，该局接群众电话报警称：湘潭大学在读研究生张某某（男，25岁）疑似被人投毒。接警后，该局立即开展调查工作。经查，4月7日，张某某因身体不适到医院就医。4月13日，张某某经多方抢救无效，因多器官衰竭死亡。公安机关侦查发现，与张某某在校同寝室的周某某（男，27岁）有重大作案嫌疑。目前，犯罪嫌疑人周某某已被该局依法刑事拘留，案件正在进一步侦办中。 湘潭大学回应学生身亡：深感悲痛 此前网传信息称，琴湖公寓11栋马院的研究生因经常被偷外卖，从化学学院弄来秋水仙碱放在外卖里“钓鱼执法”，结果10栋的张某某“中招”。
B | 4月19日，湘潭大学宣传部回应澎湃新闻，“往外卖中投毒”不属实，相关情况正核实。4月20日，湘潭大学发文回应： 曾向朋友诉苦嫌疑人与室友关系不睦，其他三人申请换宿舍未通过 投毒悲剧的发生，似乎也并非无迹可寻。小张生前好友小郭清晰记得，去年七八月份，小张就向他说起过周某，已经换过3次宿舍的周某，在当年的6月份，才搬进小张的宿舍。 27岁的周某来自湘大另一个学院，中途住进全是法学院研究生的琴湖学生宿舍10栋，在宿舍里显得格格不入。
C | 小郭听好友说，周某不太讲卫生，脾气还冲，会和人吵架。
D | 一旦和舍友们发生矛盾，担任宿舍长的小张就要出来调停。日积月累，周某与舍友们关系都不太好。 另一个导火索，可能是小张自费购买了清扫厕所的工具，带头在宿舍清理厕所，其他舍友也跟着轮流清洁。但周某拒绝参与清洁，“叫他他就不理，假装没看见。” 小张姐姐接受《北京青年报》采访时也提及此事，证实小张帮周某刷过几次厕所。 小郭说，小张生前曾向他提起，另一个室友与周某有矛盾。去年七八月，其他舍友外出实习，只剩周某和小张二人独处。有一段时间，周某经常直直地盯着小张，观察其一举一动，并用居高临下的态度对其讯问。
E | “用讯问的话问你，问你做的什么动作？就监视你，控制着你，就这种感觉”，小郭说。 这当时只被小张看作普通小摩擦。今年3月初，小张向4名死党中的另一女性好友提起，包括自己在内的3名舍友，已向校方提出申请，要求换宿舍。但最终申请未通过。
F | 小郭怀疑，可能就是张某肩负的寝室长责任，总是充当和事佬，调停舍友们和周某的矛盾，因此被周某视为“出头鸟”，将矛盾全部转移至小张一人身上。 小郭推测，周某的投毒行为应该发生在4月3日至11日这一段时间里，至于是何种毒物，小郭也不是特别清楚。 小郭还获悉，好友一开始被投毒后，感觉身体不适，告知同学后被送医。一两天后，被发现病情严重通知家人，小张虽然有意识，但已经说不出话了。 最终，湘潭中心医院无法救治，才被送往医疗水平更强的长沙湘雅医院。小郭听说，就在小张就医后一两天内，周某搬出了寝室，或许也是因此，警方怀疑到其身上。
G | （中国小康网综合湖南湘潭警方、湘潭大学官网、北京青年报、华商报大风新闻）。
Current article:http://vswtx.senchuoshaozaodidia.shop/list_3clxta/g2bf.html
Published on:22:01:18